Perpetrator Behavior

(Behavior → Emotional Harm → Legal Relevance)

Perpetrator BehaviorEmotional / Psychological Harm to VictimLegal Relevance / Evidentiary Value
Chronic manipulation, deceit, gaslightingConfusion, self-doubt, anxiety, impaired decision-making; erosion of self-trust.Demonstrates coercive control; pattern of psychological abuse; undermines victim’s ability to consent or make free decisions.
Humiliation, degradation, mocking distressShame, fear, trauma responses; lowered self-worth; hypervigilance.Establishes emotional abuse; supports claims of sadistic or controlling dynamics; shows intent to cause emotional injury.
Threats (direct or implied)Constant fear response; anticipatory anxiety; feeling unsafe; nervous-system dysregulation.Relevant for restraining orders, risk assessments, and demonstrating coercive control or intimidation.
Withholding information, finances, or resourcesDependence, loss of autonomy, helplessness; financial anxiety; inability to plan.Indicates financial abuse; supports claims of strategic control; relevant for marital asset disputes and coercive control legislation.
Sudden rage, intimidation, or explosive reactionsTrauma symptoms; hyperarousal; learned helplessness; avoidance behaviors.Shows pattern of intimidation; strengthens claims of family violence or emotional harm; impacts custody considerations.
Blaming victim for perpetrator’s wrongdoingGuilt, shame, chronic confusion (“fog”), collapse of self-esteem.Shows psychological manipulation; undermines victim credibility if not addressed; legally relevant to demonstrate coercive tactics.
Using illness, crises or threats of self-harm as controlEmotional entrapment; fear of consequences; distorted sense of responsibility for abuser.Demonstrates manipulative coercion; relevant to assessments of emotional abuse and safeguarding concerns.
Isolation from family, friends, support networksSocial withdrawal, loneliness, increased vulnerability; reduced access to help.Shows intentional isolation; one of the strongest indicators of coercive control; important in custody and safety planning.
Monitoring, surveillance, obsessive checkingFeeling watched, inability to relax, panic responses; erosion of privacy.Indicates stalking-type behaviors; supports restraining orders; demonstrates ongoing risk.
Sudden “love-bombing” followed by crueltyEmotional instability; attachment trauma; confusion; dependency.Evidence of intermittent reinforcement; strengthens claims of manipulative abuse patterns; relevant in psychological assessments.
Deriving pleasure from victim’s distressDeep emotional injury; PTSD symptoms; long-term trauma; sense of being dehumanized.Supports findings consistent with sadistic tendencies; demonstrates malicious intent, increasing legal severity.
Interference with finances, legal processes, or documentationPowerlessness; fear of losing home or stability; stress-related health impacts.Relevant for proving financial abuse, obstruction, and bad-faith behavior in divorce or civil proceedings.
Using children as tools (messages, triangulation, threats)Distress, guilt, anxiety; parental alienation dynamics; damaged family relationships.Critical in custody cases; shows emotional abuse of both victim and children; supports safeguarding measures.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.