Romantic Love + Reward / Motivation Systems

An fMRI study of a neural mechanism for mate choice (Fisher et al., 2005)

  • This fMRI study found that when people thought of or looked at their beloved, brain areas in the dopaminergic reward pathways (specifically the ventral tegmental area [VTA] and the caudate nucleus) were active. PubMed+2PMC+2
  • The authors concluded that “romantic love” functions as a motivation system, distinct from just sexual drive, and shares biobehavioural similarity with mammalian attraction systems. PubMed
  • Key takeaway: Early-stage intense romantic love engages the brain’s reward/motivation circuitry — which can create elevated emotional states, strong attachment, reduced impartiality.

The Neuroendocrinology of Love (Seshadri et al., 2016)

  • This review describes how attraction, lust, attachment involve distinct but interlinked brain circuits and neurotransmitters: dopamine, norepinephrine, cortisol, serotonin, with key nuclei like the nucleus accumbens and VTA. PMC+1
  • Example: The nucleus accumbens (a core reward node) is engaged when one experiences romantic attachment.
  • Key takeaway: The brain chemical state in love overlaps with reward/addiction pathways — meaning people in that state might be less critically vigilant.

2. Trust / Trustworthiness + Brain Mechanisms

Neural representations of honesty predict future trust (Bellucci et al., 2019)

  • The study used fMRI to show that brain signals in the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS) represent impressions of honesty/trustworthiness. Nature
  • They found that stronger connectivity between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) and temporoparietal junction (TPJ) during honesty encoding predicted higher trust later. Nature
  • Key takeaway: The brain forms internal representations of whether someone is trustworthy, and these representations influence future trusting behavior. Thus, trust is not just a social/emotional phenomenon but neuro-cognitive.

The neuroscience of trust violation: Differential activation of… (2022)

  • This study examined brain responses to trust violations (i.e., when someone fails your trust). They found differential activations when participants experienced trust being broken. IAAP Journals
  • Such breaches of trust engage brain areas associated with social cognition, emotional regulation, and possibly error/violation monitoring.
  • Key takeaway: When trust is violated, the brain reacts in ways analogous to error or conflict detection — meaning relational betrayal is processed neurologically, not just emotionally.

Putting it together:

  • When someone enters a relationship rapidly, evokes emotional attachment early, they may be leveraging the reward/motivation circuits in your brain (as per the romantic-love research) to build influence and reduce your inner vigilance.
  • Meanwhile, if they present themselves as honest/trustworthy (asset-questions, “I’m vulnerable”, “we’re partners”), they’re engaging your brain’s trust-systems (similar to the honesty/trustworthiness study). Your brain builds a “trust map” of them.
  • Once trust is established, the manipulator can exploit it (money/resource asks). The neuroscience of trust violation shows that when the trust is broken, the brain processes it as a fundamental error/conflict, which explains why you feel shock, guilt, confusion.
  • In short: reward system + trust system = vulnerability window. When someone taps both, the risk of exploitation is high.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.