By Linda C J Turner, Therapist & Advocate
One of the more covert forms of post-separation abuse is when the abuser steps back and sends a third party—often a family member—to “mediate” or “calmly” communicate on their behalf. On the surface, these messages may appear rational, reasonable, even compassionate. But beneath that façade lies a familiar psychological game: regain control, discredit the survivor, and reframe the narrative.
Let’s take a psychological lens to the message from the abuser’s sister and look at what’s really happening.
The Context Is Crucial
This message was sent on the same day as the emotional messages from your ex-partner—just hours apart. That’s no coincidence. When looked at together, this forms a pattern of coordinated pressure, aiming to overwhelm you emotionally from multiple angles.
- First comes the emotional plea from your ex.
- Then the logical voice of reason from the sister.
- Both are designed to create doubt, guilt, and a sense of obligation in you.
Let’s deconstruct the key components of her message.
“He’s totally calm and needs to speak with you…”
This line is image management. It reframes him not as the aggressor you experienced, but as a calm, rational man trying to “move forward.” This is classic gaslighting: it subtly challenges your perception of reality by presenting an opposite version of his behavior.
But you know the truth. You lived it.
“He wants to sell the house as much as you…”
This contradicts months of resistance, control, and erratic communication you experienced regarding the house. It’s an attempt to rewrite history and present him as cooperative—now that you’ve taken legal action and he feels the pressure.
Manipulators often comply only when their power is threatened, not when they have truly changed.
“You’ve blocked him from all contact…”
This is victim-blaming in disguise. It subtly paints you as the one creating obstacles, avoiding communication, or acting irrationally.
But blocking contact after abuse is a safety strategy, not an act of hostility. Survivors block abusers to protect their nervous system, regain clarity, and stop cycles of harm.
Framing your boundary as “problematic” is a classic control tactic.
“I’ve suggested using me as the middle ground…”
This is where triangulation begins. Triangulation is when one person (the abuser) brings a third party (the sister) into the conflict to avoid direct accountability or consequences.
It serves multiple psychological functions:
- It gives the abuser a mouthpiece without having to face you.
- It creates confusion and divides your attention.
- It exerts pressure under the guise of “family diplomacy.”
The moment someone says, “Talk through me,” after abuse—proceed with caution. It’s rarely neutral.
“Meet on neutral ground…”
This sounds harmless, but for trauma survivors, “neutral ground” does not erase history. Any meeting without legal or emotional safety mechanisms in place can re-trigger trauma and put the survivor at risk.
Abusers and their enablers often want informal settings—no lawyers, no paper trail, no accountability.
It’s not neutral. It’s exposure.
The False Police Report
“The police are now monitoring the house…”
This is where the mask slips. Claiming that the police are involved when they’re not is a form of coercive control and fear induction. It’s designed to:
- Scare you into compliance.
- Make you feel watched or policed.
- Create a false narrative that you are the problem or causing chaos.
But you checked with the police. You know it’s a lie. And that makes this message not only manipulative—but potentially criminal in intent. False claims can be used in court to highlight deceptive behavior and show patterns of intimidation by proxy.
The Psychological Game: Divide and Conquer
In abusive systems, family members often play roles—consciously or unconsciously—to maintain the abuser’s control. The sister here is playing the role of the “reasonable messenger,” but her message achieves the same end goal:
- Make you doubt your actions.
- Push you into unprotected conversations.
- Present the abuser in a softer light.
- Undermine your autonomy.
This is not about peace. It’s about power.
What This Teaches Us About Post-Separation Abuse
Post-separation abuse is not always loud or violent. It often comes dressed in kindness, reason, and familial concern.
But the core of abuse is control, not conflict. And when a survivor takes back control, the system around the abuser reacts. That includes family members, who may:
- Try to pull you back in.
- Present false information.
- Pressure you into private meetings.
- Suggest you’re being “too harsh” or “not forgiving.”
It’s manipulative. It’s dangerous. And it’s deeply invalidating.
A Final Note to Survivors
If someone needs a middleman to communicate with you, they’re not ready for accountability.
If a “neutral” meeting is their idea of resolving abuse, they don’t understand trauma.
And if a family member lies about police involvement to scare you, they are not safe.
You are allowed to hold your boundary.
You are allowed to say no.
You are allowed to protect your peace.
— Linda C J Turner
Trauma Therapist | Neuroscience & Emotional Intelligence Practitioner | Advocate for Women’s Empowerment
