Perpetrator-Centred Protection and Its Risks to Children

In safeguarding and psychological literature, a concerning pattern sometimes arises when the welfare of children is subordinated to the protection of an alleged or known abuser. This is often described as perpetrator-centred protection, or offender shielding, and can occur within families, institutions, or social networks.

Key characteristics include:

  • Minimising or dismissing concerns raised by children or non-offending adults
  • Prioritising family reputation, social standing, or institutional integrity over safety
  • Discouraging reporting to child protection services, law enforcement, or medical professionals
  • Using silence, secrecy, or legal tools (e.g., NDAs or gag clauses) to restrict disclosure
  • Shifting blame or responsibility onto the victim or other family members

Psychological and safeguarding implications:

  • Children remain exposed to ongoing risk of harm
  • Victims experience isolation, invalidation, and reduced access to support
  • Families may unwittingly reinforce the offender’s control and power
  • Systems fail to identify patterns of abuse, allowing escalation

Why it happens:

Research identifies multiple contributing factors, including:

  • Fear of stigma or reputational damage
  • Loyalty conflicts within families or institutions
  • Cognitive dissonance or denial
  • Misunderstanding of child protection responsibilities

Guiding principles for safeguarding and advocacy:

  1. Child safety is paramount — legal, familial, or institutional interests never override protection.
  2. Early reporting and intervention are critical to prevent harm.
  3. Support networks must prioritise the child and non-offending caregivers, rather than focusing on the alleged perpetrator.
  4. Training and awareness for families, schools, and institutions help prevent inadvertent collusion or shielding.

Summary:

Perpetrator-centred protection is not about intent; it is about impact. Even well-meaning adults can inadvertently enable abuse if they prioritise reputation, comfort, or loyalty over the child’s safety. Safeguarding frameworks exist to prevent this and to ensure accountability and protective action.

Photo by Dmitriy Zub on Pexels.com

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.