Perfect — let’s bring in attachment theory, because it really shows how people can confuse love with securitydepending on their early experiences and nervous system patterns.
🔎 Attachment-Style Lens: Love vs. Security
1. Secure Attachment
- Experience of love:Â Warm, trusting, mutually supportive.
- Experience of security: Natural part of love — they expect consistency, so security feels like love.
- Confusion risk: Low — they can distinguish passion from stability, and usually won’t mistake intensity for love.
2. Anxious Attachment
- Experience of love: Often equated with closeness, intensity, or reassurance.
- Experience of security: Hard to trust — they crave it but doubt it will last.
- Confusion risk: They may confuse the anxiety of chasing love with being in love. For them, insecurity can feel like proof of passion.
3. Avoidant Attachment
- Experience of love: Can feel threatening — too much closeness feels suffocating.
- Experience of security:Â Found in independence, self-reliance, and emotional distance.
- Confusion risk: They may mistake emotional distance for security, and avoid love’s vulnerability. Relationships may feel “safe” when they’re low in intimacy.
4. Disorganized (Fearful-Avoidant) Attachment
- Experience of love:Â Deep craving for connection mixed with fear of being hurt.
- Experience of security: Feels foreign or unsafe — consistency can even trigger suspicion.
- Confusion risk: They may swing between seeking intensity (thinking it’s love) and pulling away when security appears (mistaking it for danger).
đź’ˇ The Core Confusion
- Anxious style: mistakes insecurity for love. (“If I feel nervous or jealous, it must mean I care deeply.”)
- Avoidant style: mistakes distance for security. (“If I keep space, I’ll be safe — that’s what stability feels like.”)
- Secure style: integrates both. (“Love feels safe and stable, and passion can grow within that.”)
👉 So in short:
- Love is about emotional connection.
- Security is about nervous system regulation.
- Your attachment style often determines whether you seek heat and chaos or calm and safety — and whether you can accept having both together.
