Coercive Control Tactic — Visual Map (Conceptual)

START: Threat to Control

Trigger:
• Truth may come out
• Witnesses already know too much
• Affairs / abuse risk exposure

⬇️

1. CONTROL ACTIVATION

Internal state (abuser):
• Fear of losing dominance
• Fear of reputation damage
• Fear of accountability

Key driver:

“If people see the real situation, I lose power.”

⬇️

2. ISOLATION MANOEUVRE

External behaviour:
• Discouraging friends from visiting
• Blocking family from moving nearby
• Creating tension around supporters
• Framing it as “concern”, “drama”, or “bad timing”

Typical phrasing:

“I don’t think it’s a good idea for your sister-in-law to move here.”

Purpose (not stated):
Remove witnesses. Remove mirrors. Remove reality checks.

⬇️

3. NARRATIVE DOMINANCE

What changes once isolation works:
• Only one version of events circulates
• Gaslighting goes unchallenged
• Abuse reframed as misunderstandings
• Affairs and patterns stay hidden

Result:
You hear their story more than your own experience.

⬇️

4. TRAUMA IMPACT (Victim)

Nervous system effects:
• Chronic alertness (hypervigilance)
• Self-doubt (“Maybe it is me”)
• Shame and confusion
• Trauma bonding
• Delayed or stalled healing

Core injury:
Reality becomes unsafe to trust.

⬇️

5. REINFORCEMENT LOOP

System outcome:
• Isolation strengthens control
• Control increases fear of exposure
• Fear drives further isolation

Cycle continues until interrupted by:
• External witnesses
• Legal boundaries
• Professional validation
• Physical or emotional distance


🔍 Why this matters

This pattern is not about relationships.
It is about controlling the flow of truth.

People who are safe do not fear:
• your family
• your friends
• proximity
• witnesses

Only secrecy fears witnesses.


One grounding sentence to keep

If someone tries to keep reality away from other people, they are protecting themselves — not you.


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.