Psychological Risk Assessment Framework (Forensic / Clinical Context)

In cases involving allegations of coercive control, threats, and violence within an intimate relationship, psychologists may use validated forensic assessment tools to evaluate risk, behavioural patterns, and likelihood of future harm. These tools do not diagnose in isolation but inform structured professional judgment.

HCR-20 (Historical–Clinical–Risk Management-20)

The HCR-20 is a structured professional judgment tool used to assess the risk of future violence. It considers:

  • Historical factors (e.g., past violence, threats, escalation patterns)
  • Clinical factors (e.g., impulsivity, lack of insight, emotional regulation)
  • Risk management factors (e.g., response to boundaries, compliance with conditions, stressors)

In cases where there is documented escalation from psychological intimidation to physical violence, the HCR-20 is relevant for evaluating ongoing risk and protective needs.


PCL-R (Psychopathy Checklist–Revised)

The PCL-R is used by trained forensic psychologists to assess personality traits associated with manipulative, callous, or antisocial behaviour, which may correlate with violent or coercive conduct.

This tool evaluates traits such as:

  • Lack of empathy or remorse
  • Deceitfulness and manipulation
  • Shallow affect
  • Dominance and entitlement

It is particularly relevant where there is evidence of intimidation, exploitation of power imbalances, and disregard for the impact of behaviour on others, including children.


Structured Clinical Interviews

In addition to formal tools, psychologists may conduct structured or semi-structured interviews, using open-ended questioning to assess:

  • Patterns of conflict resolution
  • Capacity for empathy and accountability
  • Triggers for anger or aggression
  • Attitudes toward control, entitlement, and boundaries

Discrepancies between self-report and documented or witnessed behaviour may be clinically significant.


Purpose and Use

These tools support:

  • Risk assessment for future harm
  • Informed safeguarding decisions
  • Expert opinions in family and criminal proceedings

They are used as part of a holistic assessment, alongside documentation, witness statements, and observed behaviour patterns.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.